"Rust has made about 40% of what GMod made in 9 years"

Well, people like doing the opposite of what you ask them, don't they? We never exactly wanted people to not buy the game, as such, but at the same time it serves as a warning - if they buy it then it crashes we can say 'we told you so'!

Still, it's surprising how many people did buy it.

Yeah - we never, ever expected anything to dwarf GMod's success. I did some rough maths this morning: in terms of profits, from sales and royalties, in a month Rust has made about 40 per cent of what GMod has made in about nine years. We can't really believe it.

Yeah, we've hired in the last year - we've got about fifteen people working for us now.

We run it kind of like Valve - we just let people get on with it. It's sort of self-managing - we don't have any actual managers, really. People are good at their jobs, so they should be able to just get on with what they're doing.

A couple, yeah. GMod's good for that because those people know who we are, they know that they're not just working for a company that's just existed for a month - they know their jobs are secure.

It's a good point, but yeah, I do. If we didn't have the money from GMod, I think we'd be doing it for free. We'd be coming home from work every night and working on the game. That money has given us a bit of security, and we've not been in a rush to release a game, until it's something we're kind of proud of, that we think is going somewhere.

I don't know - there are AAA studios who do stuff like that, plenty of them have offers where if you pre-order something you can get into the beta and play it early. It's obviously further down the line than most early access games are, but you're paying more, too. It's not that different.

The first thing people do is run around and try and bash people's heads in with a rock! They want to try and get items and build a camp. Then, after a while they simmer down and realise that they kind of need to work with other people, that if they help someone out they'll help them back. It goes back and forth like that.

I suppose when someone's kind to you in the game it stands out a lot more than when someone tries to kill you, because it doesn't happen as often. It's a lot harder to be kind to people than to just kill them and take all their stuff. You can get a lot of satisfaction from giving someone trust and not having it thrown back in your face.

Yeah, the clan stuff is kind of huge. What we really want to do is have community servers, private or listed, which you can only access if you're part of a Steam group. If you're in that sort of community already, there's likely to be a lot less killing each other.

In a way I think the players will balance it themselves - I don't think there's ever going to be a server where everyone is being friendly and nice. We have talked about things like disasters and events, though - we have the airdrops, which are positive events, and we'd like to have some that are negative, too, that people have to work together to overcome.

The natural disaster actually partly comes about because we can only have so many buildings within the engine. We thought we could use them to destroy things if a server gets too full - things like tornadoes or earthquakes or volcanoes. People on the forums really want a flood of dinosaurs.

Yeah, we really wanted to get rid of them before we launched on Steam, but kind of failed, because we didn't want people reviewing it as just another zombie survival game. We want to remove them, though - we'll probably end up removing them and replacing them with nothing, first, then working something else in eventually. We don't want to rush and end up replacing zombies with mutants or something.

We've got our theories about why this island exists, and why these people are there, that is kind of playing to the event thing that we're thinking about too. We don't really want to tell anyone about it just yet, though, because if we talk about it before we do it they'll get angry at us!

Most of the time when we're looking at the forums, we've got an idea of the problems that we're facing, it's usually obvious that some people have a good idea of what those problems and some don't. Sometimes you'll look at someone's suggestion and think 'that's a perfect solution'.

Most of the time it's pretty much the opposite: people who think you should turn red after killing a certain number of people or something, people who obviously have no idea of what we're trying to achieve with the game.

None at the moment, no. I'd feel kind of cheeky asking any more for it, really. Maybe that will change a year or so down the line, but for now it's not changing. Right now it seems like a good price to stick at.

We're kind of flattered to be mentioned in the same sentence as DayZ, to be honest, because it was kind of our inspiration, it's why we started Rust in the first place. I think it being out at the same time is probably doing us more good than if it wasn't, though. Everyone who's playing Day Z now is probably hearing about Rust and a lot of them are ending up playing Rust too.

I don't think people are going to decide on just one.

To be honest, we've got about four or five other projects on the go right now! As long as Rust pays our wages we're going to keep working on it. Even when it's 'finished', it's not finished, it'll still be updated, in the same way that Garry's mod did. I suppose it's the way with big games, there's never an end point, it just evolves.

People have kind of started modding the servers already, but in a way...this is something we're focussing on. We kind of want to make the game we want to make right now, we don't want to give lots of people tools because we know that what they'll do is make people turn red if you kill someone and stuff like that. It kind of compromises it.

We don't mind what people do on the modded servers, but we don't want to confuse new players about what the game's about, in a way. It'll probably happen eventually, but it's not as much of a priority as things like stopping the cheaters at the moment.